I felt bad when I was shooting at the animals," he said.Īlthough hunting may become more of a fun sport, it remains controversial worldwide as it leads to the slaughtering of millions of animals and birds.Īs a result, some animal rights activists believe sport hunting is nothing but killing. "To tell the truth, the hunting was a terrible experience for me.
![the hunting ground controversy the hunting ground controversy](https://cungxanh.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/1636831478_762_Predator-Hunting-Grounds-v226-0xdeadc0de.jpg)
The hunting ground controversy how to#
They spent 36,000 pounds on renting a castle, and hiring a helicopter to use for the hunt.Īs a director on the board of The Nature Conservancy, an American charitable environmental organization, Ma said the purpose of their trip to Britain was to learn how to better protect the environment. Ĭhinese e-commerce tycoon Jack Ma sparked huge controversy two years ago as he and his friends hunted 11 stags in Britain.
![the hunting ground controversy the hunting ground controversy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7k1a_3U4EYM/maxresdefault.jpg)
In the following article, I interrogate the agency that.Many rich people in China started to enjoy sport hunting in foreign countries in recent years and Chinese e-commerce tycoon Jack Ma sparked huge controversy two years ago as he and his friends hunted 11 stags in Britain. Thus, the violation of student bodies and the subsequent expectations for faculty in handling such reporting is worthy of examination. Because writing classrooms are often hotbeds of identity work, the chances for disclosure to writing faculty are arguably intensified. One abuse identified by the AAUP report involved the mandate to make all faculty mandatory reporters, and it is within this realm that my article is most particularly concerned. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a report in June 2016 articulating "The History, Uses, and Abuses of Title IX," and various colleges have formed task forces to question the role and scope of administrative control over such high-stakes cases. in Johnson and Taylor)Īfter the letter was issued in 2011, the ensuing efforts across colleges and universities have been fraught with complexity, resistance, and debates over interpretations of the letter and its requests. Monroe County Board of Education, the Supreme Court held that institutions could be held liable, under Title IX, for alleged student-on-student sexual harassment-but only in unusually aggravated circumstances: where the schools "are deliberately indifferent to sexual harassment, of which they have actual knowledge, that is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it can be said to deprive the victims of access to the educational opportunities or benefits provided by the school." (Davis, qtd. Universities, however, were paying careful attention to the letter because the precedence of institutional liability had been set. OCR defended the letter on the grounds that it served as reminder and recommendation (Johnson and Taylor). The 1972 anti-discrimination law Title IX provided the legal foundation upon which the "Dear Colleague" letter presumably rests, and yet legislators such as James Lankford of Oklahoma requested an explanation of the legal backing for the letter. The letter, which was signed by Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali, asked universities to require a "preponderance of evidence" (the lowest standard of evidence), and it also allowed for accusers to appeal when universities found the accused "not guilty" OCR further recommended that no adjudication process take longer than 60 days, and they strongly discouraged cross-examination of accusers. In 2011, the United States Department of Education's (DOE) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued the now infamous "Dear Colleague" letter on the topic of Title IX, asking institutions to put initiatives into place to better address sexual assault on campus. Note: This article contains content referring to acts of sexual violence and may be emotionally disturbing or traumatizing to some readers.
![the hunting ground controversy the hunting ground controversy](https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c800x450-w800-q80/uploads/2019/04/14478810177503.jpg)
By analyzing dominant discursive themes surrounding Title IX through the lens of disability theory, the article contends that WPAs should carefully consider the university-sanctioned practices to which they comply and must be willing to actively resist policies that may revictimize survivors and deny agentive control over their experiences.
![the hunting ground controversy the hunting ground controversy](https://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/the.hunting.ground.jpg)
This article argues that writing program administrators have a role to play in the policies surrounding response to sexual assault on college campuses.